Lance Armstrong - a hero or a cheater?
I am quite disappointed - not because of Lance my hero (biased alert!), but the article itself. The tone of the article is so negative, almost as if Lance is already convicted. Instead, Lance is just choosing not to defend himself the accusation, does it means he is guilty? Certainly not. The writer lack of legal common sense appalls me.
And it fails to make the link between Tour de France and USADA. How on earth can an US-based anti-doping agency, with no jurisdiction whatsoever, capable to stripe the title of a French race? UCI says nothing about the charges. Oh I understands now, America, Fuck yea
And I must admit, I am quite disappointed by Guardians at first, but then I saw it is a blog post, not a real newspaper article. Almost on the way to delete the Guardian from my trusted western point of view.